000			02870aaa a2200289 i 4500
003			UNISSA
005			20241112110534.0
008			241112b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 ara d
040			_aUNISSA _beng _cUNISSA _erda
050			_aBP173.7 _bK58
100			_aالكاتب, أحمد _eauthor
240			_aal-Fikr al-siyasi al-Wahhabi : Qiraʼah taḥliliyah /
245			_aالفكر السياسي الوهابي : _bقراءة تحليلية / _cأحمد الكاتب
250			_aThird edition
264		1	_aCairo : _bMaktabat Madbuli, _c2008
300			_a206 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _a volume
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_aDuring the twentieth century, the Islamic world witnessed an openness to democratic thought, and parliamentary systems and presidential elections were established in most Islamic countries, except for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which maintained an absolute totalitarian system in which the king monopolized all legislative and executive powers, and failed to bring about any democratic development. Perhaps this failure had many factors, but the most important of them may be the Wahhabi political thought that rejects democracy. Although the relationship of the Wahhabi movement with the Saudi regime was not always good, and was marred by much tension and conflict, such that it produced radical revolutionary currents that sometimes called for the beheading of the regime, it was experiencing a confusing intellectual and political crisis in which it wavered between excommunication and exit or postponement and submission, and did not find a way out between them. This is what prompted some Wahhabi opposition movements to the Saudi regime, such as the Al-Qaeda organization, to adopt alternative strategies to the internal reform process, by seeking revenge on external enemies and holding them fully responsible for the deterioration of the internal political situation. While Al-Qaeda objected to the American military presence in the land of the Two Holy Mosques, it directed all its anger at the American occupier and ignored the one calling for and seeking American protection, which is the Saudi regime. Instead of demanding that the regime expel foreign forces or work to change it politically or find a way to participate in political decision-making and pressure the government to implement legitimate policies consistent with the true religion and the national interest, it found itself forced to fight the battle with the occupying foreign enemy and take the battle to its home.
650			_aIslam and politics _x20th century
650			_aWahhabiyah.
650			_aIslamic fundamentalism.
700			_aal-Katib, Aḥmad _eauthor
942			_cKWP _2lcc
999			_c39798 _d39798