000 02376nam a2200385 i 4500
001 CR9781009076012
003 UkCbUP
005 20240508141516.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 210330s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781009076012 (ebook)
020 _z9781316513774 (hardback)
020 _z9781009074742 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
050 0 0 _aBC177
_b.L65 2022
082 0 0 _a160
_223/eng/20220513
100 1 _aLogins, Arturs,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aNormative reasons :
_bbetween reasoning and explanation /
_cArturs Logins, University of Zurich.
264 1 _aCambridge, United Kingdom ;
_aNew York, NY, USA :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource (x, 241 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aCambridge studies in philosophy
506 0 _aOpen Access.
_fUnrestricted online access
_2star
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 25 Jul 2022).
520 _aReasons matter greatly to us in both ordinary and theoretical contexts, being connected to two fundamental normative concerns: figuring out what we should do and what attitudes to have, and understanding the duties and responsibilities that apply to us. This book introduces and critiques most of the contemporary theories of normative reasons considerations that speak in favor of an action, belief, or emotion - to explore how they work. Artūrs Logins develops and defends a new theory: the Erotetic view of reasons, according to which normative reasons are appropriate answers to normative why questions (Why should I do this?). This theory draws on evidence of how why-questions work in informal logic, language and philosophy of science. The resulting view is able to avoid the problems of previous accounts, while retaining all of their attractive features, and it also suggests exciting directions for future research. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
650 0 _aReasoning.
650 0 _aQuestion (Logic)
650 0 _aNormativity (Ethics)
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781316513774
830 0 _aCambridge studies in philosophy.
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076012
999 _c38656
_d38656