000 02260nam a2200349 i 4500
001 CR9781108974714
003 UkCbUP
005 20240508141513.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 200810s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781108974714 (ebook)
020 _z9781108971324 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
050 4 _aHV8073.5
_b.G73 2022
082 0 4 _a363.25
_223
100 1 _aGrant, Tim
_c(Professor of forensic linguistics),
_eauthor.
245 1 4 _aThe idea of progress in forensic authorship analysis /
_cTim Grant.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2022.
300 _a1 online resource (74 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aCambridge elements. Elements in forensic linguistics
_x2634-7334
506 0 _aOpen Access.
_fUnrestricted online access
_2star
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Apr 2022).
520 _aThis Element examines progress in research and practice in forensic authorship analysis. It describes the existing research base and examines what makes an authorship analysis more or less reliable. Further to this, the author describes the recent history of forensic science and the scientific revolution brought about by the invention of DNA evidence. They chart the rise of three major changes in forensic science - the recognition of contextual bias in analysts, the need for validation studies and shift in logic of providing identification evidence. This Element addresses the idea of progress in forensic authorship analysis in terms of these three issues with regard to new knowledge about the nature of authorship and methods in stylistics and stylometry. The author proposes that the focus needs to shift to validation of protocols for approaching case questions, rather than on validation of systems or general approaches. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
650 0 _aForensic linguistics.
650 0 _aAuthorship
_xTechnique.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781108971324
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974714
999 _c38422
_d38422