000 02784nam a2200385 i 4500
001 CR9781009029285
003 UkCbUP
005 20240508141513.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 201211s2021||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 _a9781009029285 (ebook)
020 _z9781316516249 (hardback)
020 _z9781009014069 (paperback)
040 _aUkCbUP
_beng
_erda
_cUkCbUP
050 0 0 _aQ124.95
_b.L59 2021
082 0 0 _a509/.01
_223
100 1 _aLloyd, G. E. R.
_q(Geoffrey Ernest Richard),
_d1933-
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aExpanding horizons in the history of science :
_bthe comparative approach /
_cG.E.R. Lloyd.
264 1 _aCambridge :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2021.
300 _a1 online resource (vi, 155 pages) :
_bdigital, PDF file(s).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
500 _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Aug 2021).
505 0 _aOn aspects of the status quaestionis -- Translatability, intelligibility, revisability -- Demystifying the Greek miracle -- The question of causal factors -- The criteria of theories, simplicity for instance -- Supplementary note on Greek astronomical models -- Definitions and the problems of foreclosure -- The challenge of 'mythology' -- Elements, processes, substances, stuff -- Health and disease, illness and well-being -- Mind, body, heart, brain, soul, spirit.
520 _aThis book challenges the common assumption that the predominant focus of the history of science should be the achievements of Western scientists since the so-called Scientific Revolution. The conceptual frameworks within which the members of earlier societies and of modern indigenous groups worked admittedly pose severe problems for our understanding. But rather than dismiss them on the grounds that they are incommensurable with our own and to that extent unintelligible, we should see them as offering opportunities for us to revise many of our own preconceptions. We should accept that the realities to be accounted for are multi-dimensional and that all such accounts are to some extent value-laden. In the process insights from current anthropology and the study of ancient Greece and China especially are brought to bear to suggest how the remit of the history of science can be expanded to achieve a cross-cultural perspective on the problems.
650 0 _aScience, Ancient
_vCross-cultural studies.
650 0 _aEthnoscience.
650 0 _aScience
_xPhilosophy
_xHistory.
650 0 _aScience
_xMethodology
_xHistory.
650 0 _aScience, Ancient
_xHistoriography.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_z9781316516249
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009029285
999 _c38400
_d38400