000 04397nam a22006015i 4500
001 978-3-030-44164-7
003 DE-He213
005 20240508082636.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 200629s2020 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783030441647
_9978-3-030-44164-7
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7
_2doi
050 4 _aK5459
072 7 _aLNAC5
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW006000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLNAC5
_2thema
082 0 4 _a347.09
_223
100 1 _aKaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 1 0 _aInvestor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts
_h[electronic resource] :
_bCurrent Framework and Reform Options /
_cby Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Michele Potestà.
250 _a1st ed. 2020.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2020.
300 _aX, 117 p. 1 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSpecial Issue,
_x2510-6899
505 0 _aScope and objective of this report -- Why investment arbitration and not domestic courts? The origins of the modern investment dispute resolution system, criticism, and future outlook -- The interplay between investor-state arbitration and domestic courts in the existing IIA framework -- The path to reform of ISDS: What role for national courts? -- Conclusions and recommendations.
506 0 _aOpen Access
520 _aThis open access book examines the multiple intersections between national and international courts in the field of investment protection, and suggests possible modes for regulating future jurisdictional interactions between domestic courts and international tribunals. The current system of foreign investment protection consists of more than 3,000 international investment agreements (IIAs), most of which provide for investment arbitration as the forum for the resolution of disputes between foreign investors and host States. However, national courts also have jurisdiction over certain matters involving cross-border investments. International investment tribunals and national courts thus interact in a number of ways, which range from harmonious co-existence to reinforcing complementation, reciprocal supervision and, occasionally, competition and discord. The book maps this complex relationship between dispute settlement bodies in the current investment treaty contextand assesses the potential role of domestic courts in future treaty frameworks that could emerge from the States’ current efforts to reform the system. The book concludes that, in certain areas of interaction between domestic courts and international investment tribunals, the “division of labor” between the two bodies is not always optimal, producing inefficiencies that burden the system as a whole. In these areas, there is a need for improvement by introducing a more fruitful allocation of tasks between domestic and international courts and tribunals – whatever form(s) the international mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes may take. Given its scope, the book contributes not only to legal analysis, but also to the policy reflections that are needed for ongoing efforts to reform investor-State dispute settlement.
650 0 _aMediation.
650 0 _aDispute resolution (Law).
650 0 _aArbitration (Administrative law).
650 0 _aInternational law.
650 0 _aTrade regulation.
650 0 _aInternational economic relations.
650 1 4 _aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
650 2 4 _aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
650 2 4 _aInternational Economics.
700 1 _aPotestà, Michele.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030441630
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030441654
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030441661
830 0 _aSpecial Issue,
_x2510-6899
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7
912 _aZDB-2-LCR
912 _aZDB-2-SXLC
912 _aZDB-2-SOB
999 _c37670
_d37670