الجماعات الإسلامية المصرية المتشددة في أتون ١١ سبتمبر : مفارقات النشأة ومجازفات التحول / تأليف ممدوح الشيخ
Material type: ArticlePublisher: Cairo : Maktabat Madbuli, 2005Description: 127 pages ; 23 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 977208502X (paperback)
- al-Jamaʻat al-Islamiyah al-Miṣriyah al-mutashaddidah fi atwn 11 Sibtambir : mufaraqat al-nashʼah wa-mujazafat al-taḥawwul /
- BP52 S53
Item type | Current library | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Personal Donated Collection (KWP) - 1st floor | Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali | First Floor (Gadong Campus) | (KWP23) BP52 S53 2005 c.1 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | Donated by Yang Mulia Dato Seri Setia Dr. Haji Norarfan bin Hj Zainal | 1010037452 |
Includes bibliographical references
Egyptian extremist Islamic groups in the heat of September 11: Paradoxes of origin and metaphor of lost transformation
What are the reasons behind the assassination of President Sadat by the Islamic groups? What are the secrets of these groups? How did they emerge and grow? Why did they direct successive blows at the symbols of power? Why did they prefer to confront the security forces and assassinate some of them? What is the secret of the coup and the war that began in Assiut? Why did some groups accept the leadership of Dr. Omar Abdel Rahman, and others accepted the leadership of Colonel Abboud al-Zumar? Why did the majority reject Omar Abdel Rahman, was he blind and Abboud al-Zumar because he was a prisoner? Did some army men join the groups? Why did the groups stop directing blows at the Egyptian regime? What are the secrets of the negotiations that took place between the groups and the officials? Was Interior Minister Abdel Halim Moussa dismissed because of those negotiations? Did Sheikh Shaarawy play a role in those negotiations? What are the circumstances that led the leaders of the groups to announce the initiative to stop the violence and not oppose the regime? Is this initiative real or a maneuver to gain time, raise cadres and resume the attack when they get a suitable opportunity. Or is there a review and evaluation of the conflict process with the regime that led to the development of a new strategy for the groups.
There are no comments on this title.